lt is my hope that contemplating what is written here, at this website, will help each individual, and ultimately our nation, to rediscover the moral principles that once made America shine so brightly, and hopefully will do so once again.
Talking Points
In WW2 OUR troops had to listen to Tokyo Rose & her propaganda against the USA. Today we have to listen to ''President" Obama & the Democrats behind closed doors
Recession is when your neighbor loses his job.
Depression is when you lose your job.
Recovery is when Obama loses his job.
Help us in our Campaign to defeat
Barack Hussein Obama in 2012
PATRIOT FREEDOM IS SUPPORTED TOTALLY BY PATRIOTS LIKE YOU
Please Donate Today...A $17.76 donation, or any other amount would be greatly appreciated.
Help Save our Nation!
Interesting observation
Did you notice who Obama threatened when he wasn't getting his way on raising the debt ceiling?
He threatened to not pay: Social Security Retirees, Military Retirees, Social Security disability and Federal Retirees.
Now.. Let this sink in really good -
He did not threaten to stop payments to illegal aliens
He did not threatened to take frivolous benefits such as Internet access away from violent inmates
He did not offer to fire some of the thousands of unnecessary federal employees that he hired
He did not offer to cut down on his or his wife's frivolous gallivanting around
He did not threaten to not pay the senators and representatives or any of their staff
He did not threaten to take benefits away from welfare recipients
He did not threaten the food stamp programs
He did not threaten to not pay foreign aid
He did not threaten to cut back on anything that involves his base voters
The list could go on and on. He is in full political re-election mode!
Why are we allowing this person to destroy this wonderful country with his selfishness and his lies?
His type of change is killing our country. He needs to be stopped and only our votes can stop him.
Do not forget about his tactics when it's election time. Vote Obama out of the Presidency in 2012.
2012 - THE END OF AN ERROR!
FOOD FOR THOUGHT
Patriot Freedom Encourages all to read this story...
The Christian ministers of the late 1600’s and early 1700’s were not weak preachers that we see today.
By Pastor Roger Anghis October 16, 2011 NewsWithViews.com
They stood their ground under all conditions unrelenting in their fight for justice and resisting encroachments on the civil and religious liberties that they had helped secure.
Pastors lead in every manner necessary to fight for freedom and liberty. If we had pastors in the pulpits today with this kind of fire in their belly, we could take back all of what government has taken from us in less than a year.
As an example of their willingness to fight for the rights and liberties that they helped establish an instance arose where the crown appointed Governor Edmund Andros attempted to seize the charters of Rhode Island, Massachusetts and Connecticut, revoke the representative government and force the establishment of the British Anglican Church. Opposition to this attempt to revoke the freedoms and liberties they believed was the God ordained government they were to live by was led by the leaders of the church, the Revs. Samuel Willard, Increase Mather, and especially the Rev. John Wise.
If you want to understand better why so many states—from New York to Wisconsin to California—are teetering on the brink of bankruptcy, consider this depressing statistic: Today in America there are nearly twice as many people working for the government (22.5 million) than in all of manufacturing (11.5 million). This is an almost exact reversal of the situation in 1960, when there were 15 million workers in manufacturing and 8.7 million collecting a paycheck from the government.
It gets worse. More Americans work for the government than work in construction, farming, fishing, forestry, manufacturing, mining and utilities combined. We have moved decisively from a nation of makers to a nation of takers. Nearly half of the $2.2 trillion cost of state and local governments is the $1 trillion-a-year tab for pay and benefits of state and local employees. Is it any wonder that so many states and cities cannot pay their bills?
Every state in America today except for two—Indiana and Wisconsin—has more government workers on the payroll than people manufacturing industrial goods. Consider California, which has the highest budget deficit in the history of the states. The not-so Golden State now has an incredible 2.4 million government employees—twice as many as people at work in manufacturing. New Jersey has just under two-and-a-half as many government employees as manufacturers. Florida's ratio is more than 3 to 1. So is New York's.
Even Michigan, at one time the auto capital of the world, and Pennsylvania, once the steel capital, have more government bureaucrats than people making things. The leaders in government hiring are Wyoming and New Mexico, which have hired more than six government workers for every manufacturing worker.
Now it is certainly true that many states have not typically been home to traditional manufacturing operations. Iowa and Nebraska are farm states, for example. But in those states, there are at least five times more government workers than farmers. West Virginia is the mining capital of the world, yet it has at least three times more government workers than miners. New York is the financial capital of the world—at least for now. That sector employs roughly 670,000 New Yorkers. That's less than half of the state's 1.48 million government employees.
Don't expect a reversal of this trend anytime soon. Surveys of college graduates are finding that more and more of our top minds want to work for the government. Why? Because in recent years only government agencies have been hiring, and because the offer of near lifetime security is highly valued in these times of economic turbulence. When 23-year-olds aren't willing to take career risks, we have a real problem on our hands. Sadly, we could end up with a generation of Americans who want to work at the Department of Motor Vehicles.
The employment trends described here are explained in part by hugely beneficial productivity improvements in such traditional industries as farming, manufacturing, financial services and telecommunications. These produce far more output per worker than in the past. The typical farmer, for example, is today at least three times more productive than in 1950.
Where are the productivity gains in government? Consider a core function of state and local governments: schools. Over the period 1970-2005, school spending per pupil, adjusted for inflation, doubled, while standardized achievement test scores were flat. Over roughly that same time period, public-school employment doubled per student, according to a study by researchers at the University of Washington. That is what economists call negative productivity.
But education is an industry where we measure performance backwards: We gauge school performance not by outputs, but by inputs. If quality falls, we say we didn't pay teachers enough or we need smaller class sizes or newer schools. If education had undergone the same productivity revolution that manufacturing has, we would have half as many educators, smaller school budgets, and higher graduation rates and test scores.
The same is true of almost all other government services. Mass transit spends more and more every year and yet a much smaller share of Americans use trains and buses today than in past decades. One way that private companies spur productivity is by firing underperforming employees and rewarding excellence. In government employment, tenure for teachers and near lifetime employment for other civil servants shields workers from this basic system of reward and punishment. It is a system that breeds mediocrity, which is what we've gotten.
Most reasonable steps to restrain public-sector employment costs are smothered by the unions. Study after study has shown that states and cities could shave 20% to 40% off the cost of many services—fire fighting, public transportation, garbage collection, administrative functions, even prison operations—through competitive contracting to private providers. But unions have blocked many of those efforts. Public employees maintain that they are underpaid relative to equally qualified private-sector workers, yet they are deathly afraid of competitive bidding for government services.
President Obama says we have to retool our economy to "win the future." The only way to do that is to grow the economy that makes things, not the sector that takes things.
Mr. Moore is senior economics writer for The Wall Street Journal editorial page.
Do you still wonder where all those Wisconsin demonstrators came from?
Bet you haven’t heard how Iraqi agriculture has been destroyed since the invasion–and how US agribusiness benefits.
That’s a huge story, and one you won’t see in the corporate-owned US media.
It’s a sad story, a tragedy, something that provides infinite perspective on the purposes and consequences of unnecessary war, and begins to explain why an invasion that made little sense has never been properly investigated. Answer: because so many big economic interests stood to gain. And the losers? Ordinary folks.
If this sounds to you a lot like what is unfolding right in the United States today, you’re not imagining things. But enough of this–let’s roll the clip. Click here to watch an excerpt from a coming documentary by Rick Rowley (brought to my attention by Brasscheck TV). And please,
pass it along.
Rick Rowley: A rough short piece from a longer film we're working on about how the US destroyed agriculture in the place where it was invented 10,000 years ago.
Pentagon To Deploy 20,000 Troops In CONUS For Civil Unrest, Possible Threats To Populace
Note:I want to preface this article with the following statement — “Please get this information out to everyone. It is better to be safe than sorry.” — Shepard
Interestingly enough, this plan directly correlates with a 2009, Army funded,Rand Corporation studythat called for an internal United States police force to combat civil unrest.
This study asks several questions. First, is a Stability Police Force (SPF) necessary? An SPF is a high-end police force that engages in a range of tasks such as crowd and riot control, special weapons and tactics (SWAT), and investigations of organized criminal groups. In its ability to operate in stability operations, it is similar to such European forces as the Italian Carabinieri and French Gendarmerie.
Its focus on high end tasks makes it fundamentally different from UN or other civilian police, who deal with more routine law and order functions. It is also different from most military forces, which are generally not trained and experienced to conduct policing tasks in a civilian environment.
Second, if an SPF is necessary, what should it look like? This includes considering such issues as: its objectives, tasks, and size; its speed of deployment; its institutional capabilities; where it should be headquartered in the U.S. government and how it should be staffed (standing force, reserve force, and hybrid force); and its cost.
It is openly admitted that the internal force will be used to quell civil unrest due to massive large scale terror attacks and/or economic collapse.
Will the powers-that-be stage a repeat of the martial law threats to congress that they presented back in 2008 to get the bailouts passed, to get the debt ceiling raised now?
Rep. Brad Sherman laid out exactly took place during the bailouts in 2008:
Many people have voiced fears that this will turn our country into a total militarized police state, wondering what will happen in the future once the sheeple are conditioned to the military roaming the streets in America.
OriginalRussia Today description from 2008:Twenty thousand additional U.S. uniformed troops, set to be trained by 2011, are to help as a response to the threat of a possible mass terror attack or civil unrest following an economic collapse. But despite assurances from the Pentagon, many Americans are worried by the prospect of seeing the military guard in the streets.
Some have speculated that this is the beginning phases ofREX84 (Readiness Exercise 1984) being activated due to a catastrophic event that is yet to take place.
Could this event be a threat from afar?
NASA seems to think so. NASA recently released a warning to all employees regarding living near large bodies of water that seemed rather suspicious, take a look for yourself;
The White House document was released October 15, 2010 a few months prior to the so called “discovery” of comet C/2010 X1 (Elenin) discovered by Leonid Elenin with a 18″ telescope.
The strange thing is that only a select few sources worldwide have seen the object a few of which we traced back toDARPA directly.
The JPL orbital diagram and data seems to befictitious and reverse engineered into some type of advanced encrypted database for the upcoming event anticipated.
ELENIN,according to some researchers stands forExtinction Level Event Notable Impact November — also encoded into the name isElevin Nine(Nov. 9), and LEONID(a meteor shower that peaks in November).
On Nov 9, 2011 the earth will supposedly cross the threshold of the debris tail ofELENINon the same plain (assumingELENINis a real object that would be catastrophic)
However, this, according to our sources as well as independent researchers, is some sort of military code and ELENIN isnot a physical object.
IfELENINis not a real object we might be expecting a major earth change, a solar event caused by another space object, (possibly 2005 YU55) or a staged attack.
We must also be open to the idea that this is all a psyop for an event that the elites are going to purposely cause and blame on Elenin.
It seems almostsurrealthat this information all lines up the way it does, and is still currently under a full scale investigation byThe Intel Hub.
Also one most ponder the fact that if there was some catastrophic event that is destined to take place in the near future,would the governments of the world plan to have us in martial law and populations under control before the event, or would they wait until after?
The plan fits all to well, keep your ears to the ground.
The U.S. military expects to have 20,000 uniformed troops inside the United States by 2011 trained to help state and local officials respond to a nuclear terrorist attack or other domestic catastrophe, according to Pentagon officials.
*********
There are critics of the change, in the military and among civil liberties groups and libertarians who express concern that the new homeland emphasis threatens to strain the military and possibly undermine the Posse Comitatus Act, a 130-year-old federal law restricting the military’s role in domestic law enforcement.
*********
The American Civil Liberties Union and the libertarian Cato Institute are troubled by what they consider an expansion of executive authority.
Domestic emergency deployment may be “just the first example of a series of expansions in presidential and military authority,” or even an increase in domestic surveillance, said Anna Christensen of the ACLU’s National Security Project. And Cato Vice President Gene Healy warned of “a creeping militarization” of homeland security.
“There’s a notion that whenever there’s an important problem, that the thing to do is to call in the boys in green,” Healy said, “and that’s at odds with our long-standing tradition of being wary of the use of standing armies to keep the peace.”
This plan was quietly announced in 2008 and was set to be ready in 2011. Fast forwarding to the present time we now have clear indicators of why this military force could be needed in 2011 including economic collapse, Elenin, (PSYOP or not) and continued claims that normal everyday Americans are possible terrorists.
A growing number of citizens are taking action against the encroachment of totalitarianism here in America. GE is playing a major role in monitoring your every move while you’re INSIDE your home. How are they doing it? Ask the folks in California. Or better yet, read this piece
LBJ's Mistress Blows Whistle On JFK Assassination
The night before the Kennedy assassination, Lyndon Baines Johnson met with Dallas tycoons, FBI moguls and organized crime kingpins - emerging from the conference to tell his mistress Madeleine Duncan Brown that "those SOB's" would never embarrass him again. It's a jaw-dropping deposition and it's the biggest JFK smoking gun there is - despite the fact that it has received little media attention.
The Chinese military is the largest in military in the world boasting a 200 ..... Chinese soldiers in uniform 20 miles south of Tijuana (border of Mexico...
Mar 21, 2011 ... People Forum Chinese soldiers, invited by Mexico's Defense Ministry, take part in a military parade in culmination of bicentennial ...
http://www.peopleforum.cn/viewthread.php?tid=38290 - 27k - Cached - Similar pages
Dec 27, 2010 ... This airstrip is already fortified as a military installation. ....Mexico's border with the United States is two thousand miles long, and, ... appeared to be Chinese soldiers in Mexican army uniforms near Otay Mesa, ...
Dec 1, 2000 ... "You have to sit there and ask yourself why are there Chinese soldiers in Mexico and why have people reported seeing other blond soldiers ...
http://yowusa.com/war/2000/war-2000-12a/1.shtml - 44k - Cached - Similar pages
Aug 3, 2010 ... I suspect the ongoing so called drug warfare on the US/Mexico borders is a complex smoke screen for possible Chinese military operations and ...
http://mexicoawakening.newsvine.com/_news/2010/08/03/4808070-omg-chinese-soldiers-dressed-in-mexican-military-gear-found-on-the-us-mexican-border-not - 41k - Cached - Similar pages
Imagine the Chinese military in Cuba, Venezuela or even Mexico! It could happen, considering that some Latin American countries, having become disenchanted ...
http://www.militarynewsnetwork.com/military-china.htm - 35k - Cached - Similar pages
Mar 21, 2011 ... Rumors have begun to circulate around the internet this week regarding various sources having seen Chinese Troops and military bases set up ...
http://gold-silver.us/forum/general-discussion/chinese-troops-seen-in-mexico/ - 143k - Cached - Similar pages
Edward "Ed" Mezvinsky, born January 17, 1937, is a former Democrat congressman. As a Democrat, he represented Iowa 's 1st congressional district in the United States House of Representatives for two terms, from 1973 to 1977. In March 2001, Mezvinsky was indicted and later pleaded guilty to 31 of 69 charges of bank fraud, mail fraud, and wire fraud. Nearly $10 million was involved in the ponzi scheme. After serving five years in federal prison, he was released in April 2008. He is expected to remain on federal probation until 2011, and still owes $9.4 million in restitution to his victims. So who is he???
He's Chelsea Clinton's father-in-law.
Nary a mention of this in any of the media. If this guy was Jenna or Barbara Bush's, or better yet one of Sarah Palin's daughters, father in law, the news would have replaced the oil spill.
"Here's what I'm going to say. This is my quote. Be sure to write it down: 'Yes, I wrote Dreams From My Father. I ghostwrote the whole thing. I met with the president three or four times, and then I wrote the entire book.'" He released National Journal's arm, and beamed in Marxist triumph. "And now I would like the royalties"