PATRIOT FREEDOM...
Talking Points
Thomas J. Miller
Registered Candidate (Rep.), President of the United States of America 2012 Thomas Miller at
REDUCEGOVERNMENT.COM
Remember when women's reproductive rights activists were joyously celebrating and fist-bumping each other over Barack Obama's election? What a difference a year makes.
PATRIOT FREEDOM BELIEVES THIS IS ONE BILL THAT SHOULD BE CUT
A great little 3 minute video
SUBVERSIVE ACTIVITIES REGISTRATION ACT
South Carolina Code of Laws
Every member of a subversive organization, or an organization subject to foreign control, every foreign agent and every person who advocates, teaches, advises or practices the duty, necessity or propriety of controlling, conducting, seizing or overthrowing the government of the United States, of this State or of any political subdivision thereof by force or violence or other unlawful means, who resides, transacts any business or attempts to influence political action in this State, shall register with the Secretary of State on the forms and at the times prescribed by him. Read S.C. Story & Code here
Patriot Freedom says Americans will never surrender their Freedoms
video 
*Senator Jay Rockefeller talks about how the
internet is a menace.
Rockefeller introduced Senate bills 773 and 778. Rockefeller’s bills would allow the president to “declare a cybersecurity emergency”
relating to “non-governmental” computer networks. In other words, if passed, Rockefeller’s bill would give the president the ability
to pull the plug on the internet in the name of national security. The House legislation now moves to the Senate for consideration. Rockefeller was not alone in this assessment. His belief that the internet is the “number one national hazard” to national security is shared by the former Director of National Intelligence Mike McConnell and Obama’s current director Admiral Dennis C. Blair. “It really almost makes you ask the question would it have been better if we had never invented the internet,” said Rockefeller.
February 4, 2010, 11:22 am
This article by Anne Wortham is something...Good
Anne Wortham is Associate Professor of Sociology at Illinois State University and continuing Visiting Scholar at Stanford University's Hoover Institution. She is a member of the American Sociological Association and the American Philosophical Association.
She has been a John M. Olin Foundation Faculty Fellow, and honored as a Distinguished Alumni of the Year by the National Association for Equal Opportunity in Higher Education.
In fall 1988 she was one of a select group of intellectuals who were featured in Bill Moyer's television series, "A World of Ideas." The transcript of her conversation with Moyers has been published in his book, A World of Ideas.
Dr. Wortham is author of "The Other Side of Racism: A Philosophical Study of Black Race Consciousness" which analyzes how race consciousness is transformed into political strategies and policy issues.
She has published numerous articles on the implications of individual rights for civil rights policy, and is currently writing a book on theories of social and cultural marginality.
Recently, she has published articles on the significance of multiculturalism and Afrocentricism in education, the politics of victimization and the social and political impact of political correctness. Shortly after an interview in 2004, she was awarded tenure.
Fellow Americans,
Please know: I am Black; I grew up in the segregated South. I did not vote for Barack Obama; I wrote in Ron Paul's name as my choice for president. Most importantly, I am not race conscious. I do not require a Black president to know that I am a person of worth, and that life is worth living. I do not require a Black president to love the ideal of America .
I cannot join you in your celebration. I feel no elation. There is no smile on my face. I am not jumping with joy. There are no tears of triumph in my eyes. For such emotions and behavior to come from me, I would have to deny all that I know about the requirements of human flourishing and survival - all that I know about the history of the United States of America , all that I know about American race relations, and all that I know about Barack Obama as a politician. I would have to deny the nature of the "change" that Obama asserts has come to America .
Most importantly, I would have to abnegate my certain understanding that you have chosen to sprint down the road to serfdom that we have been on for over a century. I would have to pretend that individual liberty has no value for the success of a human life. I would have to evade your rejection of the slender reed of capitalism on which your success and mine depend. I would have to think it somehow rational that 94 percent of the 12 million Blacks in this country voted for a man because he looks like them (that Blacks are permitted to play the race card), and that they were joined by self-declared "progressive" whites who voted for him because he doesn't look like them.
I would have to wipe my mind clean of all that I know about the kind of people who have advised and taught Barack Obama and will fill posts in his administration - political intellectuals like my former colleagues at the Harvard University 'S Kennedy School of Government.
I would have to believe that "fairness" is equivalent of justice. I would have to believe that man who asks me to "go forward in a new spirit of service, in a new service of sacrifice" is speaking in my interest.. I would have to accept the premise of a man that economic prosperity comes from the "bottom up," and who arrogantly believes that he can will it into existence by the use of government force. I would have to admire a man who thinks the standard of living of the masses can be improved by destroying the most productive and the generators of wealth.
Finally, Americans, I would have to erase from my consciousness the scene of 125,000 screaming, crying, cheering people in Grant Park, Chicago irrationally chanting "Yes We Can!" Finally, I would have to wipe all memory of all the times I have heard politicians, pundits, journalists, editorialists, bloggers and intellectuals declare that capitalism is dead - and no one, including especially Alan Greenspan, objected to their assumption that the particular version of the anti-capitalistic mentality that they want to replace with their own version of anti-capitalism is anything remotely equivalent to capitalism.
So you have made history, Americans. You and your children have elected a Black man to the office of the president of the United States , the wounded giant of the world. The battle between John Wayne and Jane Fonda is over - and that Fonda won. Eugene McCarthy and George McGovern must be very happy men Jimmie Carter, too. And the Kennedys have at last gotten their Kennedy look-a-like. The self-righteous welfare statists in the suburbs can feel warm moments of satisfaction for having elected a Black person..
So, toast yourselves: 60s countercultural radicals, 80s yuppies and 90s bourgeois bohemians. Toast yourselves, Black America. Shout your glee Harvard, Princeton , Yale, Duke, Stanford, and Berkeley. You have elected not an individual who is qualified to be president, but a Black man who, like the pragmatist Franklin Roosevelt, promises to - Do Something! You now have someone who has picked up the baton of Lyndon Johnson's Great Society. But you have also foolishly traded your freedom and mine - what little there is left - for the chance to feel good.
There is nothing in me that can share your happy obliviousness.
PATRIOT FREEDOM OPPOSED TO CHANGING THE:
Don't Ask, Don't Tell--Don't Bother! Policy
Despite all of the hot issues on Capitol Hill, "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" somehow shoved its way to the front of the line, generating two hearings faster than most Democrats can say "judicial nominees."Former Marine commandant Gen. Carl E. Mundy and 1,160 of his retired flag and general officer colleagues have spoken forcibly against it, while plenty of conservatives sit in the shadows, afraid to take a position. Other groups may be skittish to take on this issue. FRC & PATRIOT FREEDOM at www.patriotfreedom.org is not. Every day, American soldiers take fire for us. This is our turn to stand on the front lines for them.
Representatives like Duncan Hunter (R-Calif.) were adamant. "The military is not civilian life," he said. Its rules don't exist to satisfy the Left's notion of "equality" or "freedom of expression." In the heat of battle, political correctness isn't a recipe for success--it's an obstruction to it.
From the L. A. Times
This lady is out of her mind and she is the speaker of the house!
Nancy Pelosi quote 'We need to raise the standard of living of our poor, unemployed and minorities. For example, we have an estimated 12 million illegal immigrants in our country who need our help"
1. 40% of all workers in L. A. County ( L. A. County has 10.2 million people)are working for cash and not paying taxes. This is because they are predominantly illegal immigrants working without a green card.
2. 95% of warrants for murder in Los Angeles are for illegal aliens.
3. 75% of people on the most wanted list in Los Angeles are illegal aliens.
4. Over 2/3 of all births in Los Angeles County are to illegal alien Mexicans on Medi-Cal, whose births were paid for by taxpayers.
5. Nearly 35% of all inmates in California detention centers are Mexican nationals here illegally.
6. Over 300,000 illegal aliens in Los Angeles County are living in garages.
7. The FBI reports half of all gang members in Los Angeles are most likely illegal aliens from south of the border..
8 Nearly 60% of all occupants of HUD properties are illegal.
9. 21 radio stations in L. A.. are Spanish speaking..
10. In L. A. County 5.1 million people speak English, 3..9 million speak Spanish.
(There are 10.2 million people in L. A. County . )
(All 10 of the above facts were published in the Los Angeles Times)
Less than 2% of illegal aliens are picking our crops, but29% are on welfare. Over 70% of the United States ' annual population growth(and over 90% of California , Florida , and New York ) results from immigration. 29% of inmates in federal prisons are illegal aliens .
We are fools for letting this continue
HOW CAN YOU HELP ?
This is only one State...............
If this doesn't open your eyes nothing will, and you wonder why Nancy Pelosi wants them to become voters!
LET'S IMPEACH HER NOW BEFORE SHE DOES FURTHER DAMAGE!! WHAT AN IDIOT!! Read Her Statement Below
Windfall Tax on Retirement Income
Adding a tax to your retirement is simply another way of saying to the American people, you're so darn stupid that we're going to keep doing this until we drain every cent from you. That's what the Speaker of the House is saying. Read below...............
Nancy Pelosi wants a Windfall Tax on Retirement Income. In other words tax what you have made by investing toward your retirement. This woman is a nut case! You aren't going to believe this.
Madam speaker Nancy Pelosi wants to put a Windfall Tax on all stock market profits (including Retirement fund, 401K and Mutual Funds! Alas, it is true - all to help the 12 Million Illegal Immigrants and other unemployed Minorities!
This woman is frightening.
She quotes...' We need to work toward the goal of equalizing income, (didn't Marx say something like this?), in our country and at the same time limiting the amount the rich can invest.' (I am not rich, are you?)
When asked how these new tax dollars would be spent, she replied:
'We need to raise the standard of living of our poor, unemployed and minorities. For example, we have an estimated 12 millionillegal immigrants in our country who need our help along with millions of unemployed minorities..Stock market windfall profits taxes could go a long way to guarantee these people the standard of living they would like to have as 'Americans'..'
(Read that quote again and again and let it sink in.) 'Lower your retirement, give it to others who have not worked as you have for it'.
Send it on to your friends. This lady is out of her mind and she is the speaker of the house!
The President today signed
an Executive Order (attached) establishing a Council of Governors to strengthen further the partnership between the Federal Government and State Governments to protect our Nation against all types of hazards. The bipartisan Council will be composed of ten State Governors who will be selected by the President to serve two year terms.
TIME charts the highs and lows of the past year in 50 wide-ranging lists
Harry Reid's great-great uncle, Remus Reid, was hanged for horse stealing and train robbery in Montana in 1889
It all depends on how you look at some things...THIS IS GOOD!
From God & Country
Judy Wallman, a professional genealogy researcher in southern California, was doing some personal work on her own family tree.
She discovered that Congressman Harry Reid's great-great uncle, Remus Reid, was hanged for horse stealing and train robbery in Montana in 1889. Both Judy and Harry Reid share this common ancestor.
The only known photograph of Remus shows him standing on the gallows in Montana territory:
On the back of the picture Judy obtained during her research is this inscription:
'Remus Reid, horse thief, sent to Montana Territorial Prison in 1885, escaped 1887, robbed the Montana Flyer six times. Caught by Pinkerton detectives, convicted and hanged in 1889.'
So Judy recently e-mailed Congressman Harry Reid for information about their great-great uncle.
Believe it or not, Harry Reid's staff sent back the following biographical sketch for her genealogy research:
"Remus Reid was a famous cowboy in the Montana Territory. His business empire grew to include acquisition of valuable equestrian assets and intimate dealing with the Montana railroad.
Beginning in 1883, he devoted several years of his life to government service, finally taking leave to resume his dealings with the railroad.
In 1887, he was a key player in a vital investigation run by the renowned Pinkerton Detective Agency.
In 1889, Remus passed away during an important civic function held in his honor when the platform upon which he was standing collapsed."
Now THAT is how it's done, folks! That's REAL POLITICAL SPIN!
Great music, and Patriotic all the way....support this artist
AudacityOfHypocrisy-
Four Tactical Steps That Will Defeat Obamacare
Michael Hammond 11/24/2009
To be a little crude about it, Barack Obama is advising us that "we're
going to be raped, no matter how loudly we scream, so we might as
well lie back and enjoy it." I don't agree with that. Now and since the
beginning of the year, history has been teetering on a fulcrum.
If we field a smarter strategy than the White House, we will defeat
Obamacare. If Republican compromisers continue to pursue
"the politics of dumb," as they have until now, we will lose --
and America will be transformed in a really nasty way for the
rest of our lifetimes.
We Can Win If We Do Four Things
1. Denounce this bill for the lying fraud scheme it is: Just as an
example: The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) "scored" the
Pelosi bill to cost $1.055 trillion -- far above Barack Obama's
$900 billion ceiling. Pelosi immediately held a press conference
and announced her bill would cost $894 billion -- a figure that did
not appear in the CBO report and which could be reached only
by subtracting projected IRS-administered penalties from
the actual cost. Furthermore, when you consider the $247
billion bribe to the American Medical Association, that Reid and
Pelosi are trying to sneak through in separate legislation, the
actual cost is $1.3 trillion. The increase in the deficit is at least
$150 billion. And, if you assume the $426 billion in Medicare
"secret cuts" will be no more achievable than the $247 billion
Medicare cuts promised in 1997, the increase in the deficit will
be at least $569 billion.
2. Make it clear that cloture is the only important vote: The corrupt
and ethically challenged Majority Leader Harry Reid (D.-Nev.) is
using fraud, intimidation and threats to force Senators Ben Nelson,
Blanche Lincoln, Mary Landrieu, Evan Bayh and Joe Lieberman
to vote for "cloture on the motion to proceed" to Obamacare --
a motion that would require 60 votes to succeed. After that, promises
Reid, these "swing votes" would be free to pretend to oppose
Obamacare by voting against it on meaningless votes requiring only
50 senators (plus Biden) to succeed. In the meantime, having gotten
Obamacare on the Senate floor, Reid would be free to use the amendment
process to play "let's make a deal" and use taxpayer money to buy
the votes he needs for final passage.
3. Don't let Reid play "Let's Make a Deal:" Reid's current proposal
is impassable.We should not repeat the mistake we made in the
Senate Finance Committee and allow Reid to tweak an impassable
bill until it becomes passable. If Reid intends to block out Republican
"killer amendments" by putting in place a procedural structure
known as the "amendment tree," fine. Let Reid's amendment tree serve
as a bar to his "let's make a deal" efforts. The good news is that, having
risked her neck to vote to "allow the process to go forward" only to
be thrown under the bus, Maine GOP Sen. Olympia Snow and the other
"swing votes" are unlikely to give up their power while they have it,
in the expectation that they will be consulted later, when they don't have
power.
4. Don't be afraid of reconciliation: None of the bills thus far produced
could be passed under expedited reconciliation procedures created
solely for legislation to reduce the deficit. This is because of limitations
in the "Byrd Rule," but also because of the budgetary requirements of
the 1974 Budget Act itself. Sen. Chuck Schumer (D.-N.Y.) and MSNBC
are too stupid to understand the Budget Act, but we aren't. Most importantly,
fight like the future of America depends on it. Because, surely, it does.
Mr. Hammond is a long-time Senate staff member, for many years
serving as general counsel to the Senate Republican Steering Committee.
Thought you might be interested in this forgotten bit of information.........
It was 1987! At a lecture the other day they were playing an old news video of Lt.Col. Oliver North testifying at the Iran-Contra
Hearings during the Reagan Administration. There was Ollie in front of God and country getting the third degree, but what he said was stunning! He was being drilled by a senator, 'Did you not recently spend close to $60,000 for a home security system?' Ollie replied, 'Yes, I did, Sir.'
The senator continued, trying to get a laugh out of the audience, 'Isn't that just a little excessive?'
'No, sir,' continued Ollie.
'No? And why not?' the senator asked.
'Because the lives of my family and I were threatened, sir.'
'Threatened? By whom?' the senator questioned.
'By a terrorist, sir' Ollie answered.
'Terrorist? What terrorist could possibly scare you that much?'
'His name is Osama bin Laden, sir' Ollie replied.
At this point the senator tried to repeat the name, but couldn't pronounce it, which most people back then probably couldn't. A couple of people laughed at the attempt. Then the senator continued.. Why are you so afraid of this man?' the senator asked.
'Because, sir, he is the most evil person alive that I know of', Ollie answered.
'And what do you recommend we do about him?' asked the senator.
'Well, sir, if it was up to me, I would recommend that an assassin team be formed to eliminate him and his men from the face of the earth.'
The senator disagreed with this approach, and that was all that was shown of the clip.
By the way, that senator was Al Gore!
Also:
Terrorist pilot Mohammad Atta blew up a bus in Israel in 1986. The Israelis captured, tried and imprisoned him. As part of the
Oslo agreement with the Palestinians in 1993, Israel had to agree to release so-called 'political prisoners.'
However, the Israelis would not release any with blood on their hands. The American President at the time, Bill Clinton, and his Secretary of State, Warren Christopher, 'insisted' that all prisoners be released.
Thus Mohammad Atta was freed and eventually thanked us by flying an airplane into Tower One of the World Trade Center. This was reported by many of the American TV networks at the time that the terrorists were first identified.
It was censored in the US from all later reports.
If you agree that the American public should be made aware of this fact, pass this on.
The Democrats should read history (but they probably have and just chuckle) about the
Financial screwing they have already given the people of this country. Why are these people elected?
32nd. President, Democrat
Terms of Office March 4, 1933, to April 12, 1945
|
Franklin Delano. Roosevelt (Terms of Office March 4, 1933, to April 12, 1945), a Democrat, introduced Social Security (FICA) Program. He Promised:
1.) That participation in the Program would be Completely voluntary,
2.) That the participants would only have to pay 1% of the first $1,400 of their annual Incomes into the Program,
3.) That the money the participants elected to put Into the Program would be deductible from Their income for tax purposes each year,
4.) That the money the participants put into the Independent 'Trust Fund' rather than into the General operating fund, and therefore, would Only be used to fund the Social Security Retirement Program, and no other Government program, and
5.) That the annuity payments to the retirees would never be taxed as income.
Since many of us have paid into FICA for years and are now receiving a Social Security check every month -- and then finding that we are getting taxed on 85% of the moneywe paid to the Federal government to 'Put Away' -- you may be interested in the following: |
----------THEN---------------------------------------------------
34th. President, Republican,
Term Of Office: January 20, 1953 to January 20, 1961
|
Insert by Vincent Peter Render,
If I recall correctly, 1958 is the first year that Congress, not President Eisenhower, voted to remove funds from Social Security and put it into the GeneralFund for Congress to spend.
If I recall correctly, it was a democratically controlledCongress.
>From what I understand, Congress' logic at that time was that there was so much money in Social Security Fund that it would never run out / be used up for the purpose it was intended / set aside for. |
-------------WORSE STILL------------------------------------------------
Term Of Office: November 22, 1963 to January 20, 1969
|
Question: Which Political Party took Social Security from the Independent 'Trust Fund' and put it into the General Fund so that Congress could spend it?
Answer: It was Lyndon B. Johnson (Democrat, Term of Office: November 22,1963 to January 20, 1969) and the democratically Controlled House and Senate. |
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Question: Which Political Party eliminated the income tax Deduction for Social Security
Answer: The Democratic Party.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
William Jefferson Clinton
Democrat Term of Office: January 20, 1993 to January 20, 2001
|
Democrat Term of Office: January 20, 1993 to January 20, 2001
|
Question: Which Political Party started taxing Social Security annuities?
Answer: The Democratic Party, with Albert Arnold Gore, Jr. (Al Gore) [Vice President Term of Office: January 10, 1993 to January 20, 2001] casting the 'tie-breaking' deciding vote as President of the Senate, while he was Vice President of the US ... |
------------------THE STRAW THAT BROKE THE CAMEL'S BACK !!-------------------------------------------------
Term of Office: January 20, 1977 to January 20, 1981
|
Question: Which Political Party decided to start giving Annuity payments to immigrants?
ANSWER: That's right! JAMES EARL CARTER, JR. (jimmy CARTER) (DEMOCRAT, TERM OF OFFICE: JANUARY 20, 1977 TO JANUARY 20, 1981 AND THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY.
IMMIGRANTS MOVED INTO THIS COUNTRY, AND AT AGE 65, BEGAN TO RECEIVE SOCIAL SECURITY PAYMENTS: THE DEMOCRATIC PARTYGAVE THESE PAYMENTS TO THEM,EVEN THOUGH THEY NEVER
"Damn", have you ever seen a Jack-ass eating briers...!
|
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Then, after violating the original contract (FICA), the Democrats turn around and tell you that the Republicans want to take your Social Security away!
And the worst part about it is uninformed citizens believe it!
If enough people receive this, maybe a seed of Awareness will be planted and maybe changes WILL evolve! . Maybe not, some Democrats are awfully sure of what isn't so. But it's worth a try. How many people can YOU send this to?
Actions speak louder than bumper stickers.
|
Term of Office: January 20, 1777 to January 20, 1781
"A government big enough to give you everything you want, is strong enough to take everything you have".
|
Census 2010:
This week 140,000 temporary Census employees start fanning out nationwide to start accounting for every single American address WITH GPS DEVICES
Address Canvassing Starts Next Week...Census 2010 What a bunch of bull...t spoken at the meetings..read thes two articles and look between the lines....
Census 2010: One Year Away...However, this week 140,000 temporary Census employees start fanning out nationwide to start accounting for every single American address. Originally designed for next year's follow-up visits, the GPS-enabled devices instead will be used only this year due to concerns about how well they would operate in different environments across the country. Read Here & Here
some interesting obsevations:
1) Committee will continue to work to make sure that resources are targeted to the hardest to enumerate areas, including Asians, Latinos, African Americans and emerging markets.
2.) Rep. William Clay (D-Mo.) chairman of the House subcommittee with oversight of the Census, told audience members later that "We need to know what’s happening in your communities and how we can help you. The audience was made up of Representatives from media companies including BET, Univision, National Newspaper Publishers Association, the Nielsen Company and Fundacion Azteca America that will help spread the word through public service announcements and other efforts; representatives from national organizations including Goodwill Industries, Asian American Justice Center, National Congress of American Indians, Voto Latino and NAACP, who will also spread the word among their members.
3.)We will also depend on you to expose any attempts to misinform or deceive the public by those who are attempting to suppress the count. Let your communities know that the census is confidential and they need not fear their government.
Senate kills census citizenship amendment
Lawmakers voted 60 to 39 to effectively kill an amendment by Sens. David Vitter (R-La.) and Robert Bennett (R-Utah) that would have excluded illegal immigrants from population totals used to apportion Congressional seats in each state
SEIU Executive Vice President Eliseo Medina applauded the Senate's move, calling the Vitter-Bennett amendment a "misguided attempt to undercut 2010 enumeration efforts and mar this critical process with hateful, anti-immigrant politics.
also...
Napolitano Announces Obama Administration Plan
to Give Amnesty to Illegal aliens
Congress moves to control all U.S. water..."The bill also defines "waters of the United States" with such breathtaking scope that federal agencies would be required to regulate use of every square inch of the U.S., both public and private," according to the American Land Rights Association. Read Here
The current debate about Obamacare, with its mandate that all individuals must carry health insurance, provides some good examples of how Congress has lost any interest in understanding or articulating sound constitutional bases for their actions.
Mark Fitzgibbons, writing at American Thinker
When asked where in the Constitution Congress is authorized to mandate health insurance for individuals, those favoring such legislation sound like babbling morons. See:
Does the U.S. Constitution authorize Congress to force Americans
to buy health insurance? The Answer is NO,NO,NO. Read it >>> Here
WHAT PASSPORT DID OBAMA USE?
Very Interesting Questions~
More questions, and this time some good questions.
Let also get in the middle of
the Obama birthissue, Paul Hollrah over at FSM did so yesterday and
believes the issue can be resolved by Obama answering one simple question:
